America's Revolutionary Energy Bonanza
Walter Russell Mead weighs in with some profound insights on America's huge, game-changing, job-creating, energy bonanza:
"Forget peak oil; forget the Middle East. The energy revolution of the
21st century isn’t about solar energy or wind power and the “scramble
for oil” isn’t going to drive global politics. The energy abundance that
helped propel the United States to global leadership in the 19th and
2oth centuries is back; if the energy revolution now taking shape lives
up to its full potential, we are headed into a new century in which the
location of the world’s energy resources and the structure of the
world’s energy trade support American affluence at home and power
abroad.
By some estimates, the United States has more oil than Saudi Arabia,
Iraq and Iran combined, and Canada may have even more than the United
States. A GAO report released last May (pdf link can be found here)
estimates that up to the equivalent of 3 trillion barrels of shale oil
may lie in just one of the major potential US energy production sites.
If half of this oil is recoverable, US reserves in this one deposit are
roughly equal to the known reserves of the rest of the world combined.
Domestically, the energy bonanza changes the American outlook far
more dramatically than most people yet realize. This is a Big One, a
game changer, and it will likely be a major factor in propelling the
United States to the next (and still unknown) stage of development —
towards the next incarnation of the American Dream.
The energy revolution is first and foremost a revolution that affects
jobs. We are in the very early stages, but since the financial crisis
of 2008, fracking alone has created something like 600,000 new jobs in
the United States, says the FT.
Throw in more jobs in both extracting and refining the new energy
wealth, and add the manufacturing and processing industries that will
return to US shores to benefit from cheap, secure and abundant energy
and feedstock, and it is clear that the energy revolution will be a jobs
revolution.
These jobs pay well; for the first time in a generation we are
looking at substantial growth of high-income jobs for skilled blue
collar workers. Some of these jobs, especially with overtime, will pay
in the six figures; most offer wages well above the national blue collar
average.
Nature — or perhaps Nature’s God — seems to love mocking pundits.
Just when the entire punditocracy, it sometimes seemed, had bought into
the “American decline” meme, Europe collapsed and huge energy reserves
were discovered underneath the United States. The “special providence”
that observers have from time to time discerned in America’s progress
through history doesn’t seem to be quite finished with us yet.
Getting the new oil and gas raises complicated technical and
environmental issues, and it may take some time before the dust settles
and we understand exactly what we are looking at here. And drilling is a
notoriously uncertain business. The energy revolution may fall short of
the full hopes it stirs up. Yet the rapid progress of extraction
technology is making these unconventional reserves look more real and
more ‘gettable’ all the time. Rather than coping gracefully with the
consequences of inevitable decline, America’s job in the 21st century
looks like handling its new set of opportunities wisely and well."
HT: Matt B.
5 Comments:
When will the GOP call for eliminating ethanol?
Seems like a bad idea getting worse--and it mandated, and subsidized.
The very picture of socialism and government diktat ruling over business and consumer free choice.
Romney?
Anyone?
The type of shale oil being described in the linked report should NOT be confused with the currently active "oil shale" plays such as the Bakken and Eagleford. The Green River oil shale is an entirely different beast requiring entirely different technologies to recover. Those technologies are still far from economic at current prices and have significant environmental and technological hurdles yet to overcome. Furthermore recovering "half of the reserves in place" is extremely difficult in the best conventional reservoirs. Doing so in these shales is extremely unlikely.
Bakken and other tight oil recovery rates are currently in the single digit percents. With technological advances the hope is to double or triple that over time. This 'shale oil' referenced (not 'oil shaile') is a different animal. Recovery rates of 50%? Not enough water is in lake Michigan to get you to 5%! Never let an economist talk about natural resources. They always ignore the science and forget about price!
Facts Based On 2011 Data
The world consumes 31,755,000,000 barrels of oil per year (31.7 Billion Barrels)
The US consumes 7,117,500,000 barrels of oil per year (7.1 Billion Barrels [22% of World Production])
Gulf of Mexico Reserves
Discovered: 2006
Size: 7 – 15 Billion Barrels
Could keep world economy running for: 3 to 6 months.
Could keep US economy running for: 1 to 2 years.
Largest oil resource discovered since Prudhoe Bay.
Prudhoe Bay
Discovered: 1968
Size: 10 – 25 Billion Barrels
Actual Production To Date: 11 Billion Barrels
Remaining Reserves: 2 Billion Barrels
Alaska National
Wildlife Reserve (ANWR)
Latest Estimates: 1998
Size: 5.7 – 16 Billion Barrels
Could keep world economy running for: 2 to 7 months.
Could keep US economy running for: 1 to 2 years.
North Dakota Tight Oil (Bakken)
The average tight oil well, over its lifetime, produces roughly 150 barrels of oil per day.
The average tight oil well will only produce 550,000 barrels of oil in its lifetime.
The lifetime oil production from a single tight oil well can keep the world running for: 9 minutes.
The lifetime oil production from a single tight oil well can keep the US running for: 40 minutes.
The Deepwater Horizon could have produced that much in 100 days if
it hadn’t exploded.
THE WORLD CONSUMED AS MUCH OIL IN THE LAST 22 YEARS AS IT DID IN THE 200 YEARS BEFORE THAT.
LOL...
Did anyone look at what the GAO was touting? We got the same old oil shale promise that we have heard for the better part of a century. What you need is economic hydrocarbon reserves, not hydrocarbons that take more energy to extract than they contain.
And this is why Mark lacks credibility on this subject; he cherry picks every little claim that supports his story while he ignores the fact that the very shale gas story that he was hyping led to massive capital destruction as producers wound up selling their product for less than cost for several years and had to keep borrowing in order to stay afloat. The world needs rational thinkers who discuss reality, not naive optimists who ignore what reality is showing us.
Post a Comment
<< Home