Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Odds For Obama Now 6.2 To 1 On Intrade

86% for Obama vs. 14% for McCain.

The opinion poll average at Real Clear Politics shows Obama at 50.6%, with a 7.6% margin over McCain (43%).

18 Comments:

At 10/22/2008 11:12 AM, Anonymous Norman said...

Sept 15: Obama chance of winning, 50%; S&P 500 at 1,250. Oct 21: Obama chance of wining 85%; S&p 500 at 955 (-24%, -$2.4 trillion).

Not a coincidence.

 
At 10/22/2008 11:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, yeah. Where have we heard this before?

1980, Reagan trails Carter by 8 points in October.

2000, well, read it for yourselves:

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/10/05/tracking.poll/index.html


This is voter suppression, plain and simple, the MSM tries to build a sense of momentum for the Democrat candidate in an attempt to influence undecided voters and convince Republicans that showing up to vote is futile.

 
At 10/22/2008 1:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"This is voter suppression, plain and simple, the MSM tries to build a sense of momentum for the Democrat candidate in an attempt to influence undecided voters and convince Republicans that showing up to vote is futile."

Yea, we liberals are all part of this vast left wing conspiracy...

 
At 10/22/2008 1:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Yea, we liberals are all part of this vast left wing conspiracy..."

Are you part of the MSM? If not, it's clear that your the one with the conspiracy issues. If you are, maybe you can explain how, in a nation evenly divided politically, we have a media that self-indentifies as 90+ percent liberal? How do you get such an ideologically lopsided situation without blacklisting?

 
At 10/22/2008 1:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Are you part of the MSM? If not, it's clear that your the one with the conspiracy issues."

"How do you get such an ideologically lopsided situation without blacklisting?"

I think the better question would be; how do you not know the difference between you're and your?

 
At 10/22/2008 2:05 PM, Blogger juandos said...

Hmmm, were those odds announced prior to this questionable gem from the AP?

AP presidential poll: All even in the homestretch

"Yea, we liberals are all part of this vast left wing conspiracy"...

Nobody marches in lock step like a socialist (the word, 'liberal' is just an attempt to whitewash the socialist mindset in you)...

 
At 10/22/2008 2:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I think the better question would be; how do you not know the difference between you're and your?"

My bad. But either way the lunacy is all YOURS.

 
At 10/22/2008 2:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonder why the market is selling off?

First, there is Obama's plan to double the capital gains and dividend taxes.

Next, there is this:

http://www.workforce.com/section/00/article/25/83/58.php

Pathetic.

 
At 10/22/2008 3:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"My bad. But either way the lunacy is all YOURS."

Now we all know you are at least capable of learning. Baby steps.

 
At 10/22/2008 6:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So far, I've learned your a pathetic, metrosexual troll.

 
At 10/22/2008 7:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

George Bush destroyed everything Ronald Reagan worked for.

 
At 10/23/2008 7:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So far, I've learned your a pathetic, metrosexual troll."

There you go with the "your" again... To be taken seriously in life you have to at least know common English. See when you are thinking "you are" in your (not you're) head you have to write you're. See what I did there?

Once you have mastered common English phrases maybe then you can come back and bloviate on how much Obama is going to destroy America. Until then maybe you should sit this next one out Champ.

It has to be tough to tell if someone is a "metro sexual" through their postings on a blog. Please tell us all the process of your deduction.

 
At 10/23/2008 10:05 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I used the word "your" again because I knew you wouldn't be able to resist a response. Too, funny.



As for deducing that you're a metrosexual, that was easy. When you were unable to respond to the argument, and instead became fixated on grammatical errors, well, that's just the path a pathetic, limp wristed, loser would take.





Please, keep playing along.

 
At 10/23/2008 12:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

" When you were unable to respond to the argument, and instead became fixated on grammatical errors, well, that's just the path a pathetic, limp wristed, loser would take."
hahahahahaha.....too funny. I love it.
db

 
At 10/23/2008 12:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"When you were unable to respond to the argument, and instead became fixated on grammatical errors, well, that's just the path a pathetic, limp wristed, loser would take."

As opposed to school yard name calling? I would think an intellectual would resort to a different tactic to prove a point, but then again an intellectual would know the difference between "your" and "you're".

So far from your (not you're) name calling and grammatical errors I have concluded that your a 5 year old and should probably step away from your dads computer. Or if I may step down to your level for a moment, neener neener. Is that clear?

 
At 10/23/2008 12:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I put more faith in the reasoning of the average 5 year old than in the fully developed ideas of real leftist intellectuals like these:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJn5b8_weUY

 
At 10/23/2008 12:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One more thing, it's just like you metrosexual scum to stoop to using the N word. 5 year olds have feelings, too!

I'm rubber, you're (notice how I used the contraction for "you are") glue. Whatever you say bounces of me and sticks to you.

 
At 10/23/2008 5:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"should probably step away from your dads computer."

Shouldn't that be your dad's (not dads) computer? Just checking since you seem to be the grammar Nazi.
db

 

Post a Comment

<< Home