The blue line in the chart above displays total annual print newspaper advertising revenue (for the categories national, retail and classified) based on actual annual data from 1950 to 2011, and estimated annual revenue for 2012 using quarterly data through the second quarter of this year, from the Newspaper Association of America (NAA). The advertising revenues have been adjusted for inflation using the CPI, and appear in the chart as millions of constant 2012 dollars. Estimated print advertising revenues of $19.0 billion in 2012 will be the lowest annual amount spent on print newspaper advertising since the NAA started tracking ad revenue in 1950.
The decline in print newspaper advertising to a 62-year low is amazing by
itself, but the sharp decline in recent years is pretty stunning. This
year's ad revenues of $19 billion will be less than half of the $46
billion spent just five years ago in 2007, and a little more than one-third of
the $56.5 billion spent in 2004.
Here's another perspective: It took 50 years to go from
about $20 billion in annual newspaper print ad revenue in 1950 (adjusted for
inflation) to $63.5 billion in 2000, and then only 12 years to go from
$63.5 billion back to less than $20 billion in 2012.
Even when online advertising is added to the print ads (see red line in chart), the combined
total spending for print and online advertising this year will still only
be about $22.4 billion, less than the $22.47 billion
spent on print advertising in 1953.
It's another one of those huge Schumpeterian gales of creative destruction.