"So, after the Vienna United Methodist church posted three messages one day last month — offering refuge from the heat, then promoting its Web site and finally listing the time of a group prayer meeting — a zoning inspector called it a sin and hit the church with a warning letter":
“It is noted that the screens changed more than twice in a twenty-four (24) hour period,” the letter stated. “This changeable copy LED sign is considered a prohibited sign.”
"The county offered two choices: permanently limit the sign to two message changes per day or remove it altogether. At a meeting at the end of July, about two months after the church installed the sign, the county and the congregation couldn’t agree on a compromise. So the church, believing that the First Amendment also applies to the word of God, sued last week in federal court in Alexandria, saying the two-message limit violates the church’s rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion. The suit says that the county’s ordinance violates a 2000 law, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, which prohibits zoning rules that place undue burdens on religious institutions."
Update: Fairfax County says it will revisit sign rule that sparked church lawsuit
HT: Curtis
Purington
I'm not sure what the logic behind such an ordnance would be.
ReplyDeleteWhen did we did we start requiring regulation to be logical?
ReplyDeleteWell, even the illogical regulations have reasons behind them. Protectionism is in the name of protecting jobs. Minimum wage is in the name of helping poor. I'm just wondering what justification was used to convince the city board to go along with this.
ReplyDeleteThose signs are actually very distracting to people trying to concentrate on driving....while they are texting and talking on the phone.
ReplyDeleteAh that could be, Moe.
ReplyDeleteMethinks
ReplyDelete"hen did we did we start requiring regulation to be logical?"
Beat me to it.
JM, if I were a betting woman (and I am!), I'd bet that hearing the explanation would not lift your confusion.
ReplyDeleteI was only 0.333% kidding when I wrote that question.
.333 repeating, of course.
ReplyDeleteLarry??? Where are you when we need you?
ReplyDeleteWe can't figure out a reason for this regulation and, not only do you live in Virginia, you're the only one I can think of that could either:
a) tell us why this is totally sensible
or
b) tell us that we need to find a country with no sign regulations to compare it to before we could ever figure it out.
LOL, Mike!!
ReplyDeleteJon,
ReplyDelete"Protectionism is in the name of protecting jobs. Minimum wage is in the name of helping poor."
Actually, I think they both have their roots in racism...so, let's see, what hidden agenda could there be? Just a thought, but what if electronic signs are limited by the lobby of traditional billboard? They can't compete with the volume....Just a thought.
Kuhchung,
ReplyDeleteIt is a well established fact that us finance types over-estimate the importance of precision to the 18th significant digit when the reality is that could fit jupiter into the "wiggle room" in our estimates.
Methinks,
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad somebody was still here to read that because I was actually laughing while I typed it.
I'm going for drinks. Have a great Labor Day weeked, everybody!
Traffic controls - both "red lights" and "Walk" signs - change three times in three minutes. Apparently, the laws do not apply to the government. Also, have you ever seen spinning signs, triangular or rectangular on a pole? What about the Time & Temp on banks? Apparently, none exists in Vienna, Virginia -- or they don't change, despite changes in time and temperature, you know like a stopped clock being right twice a day...
ReplyDeletewe had a similar kerfuffle down my way except it involved the color and how often it had movement.
ReplyDeleteThe highway safety folks believe these kinds of signs are distracting to which I say No Shit.
but the highway guys are insistent that these signs will increase the number of accidents...cause personal and property injury, increase ambulance and tow truck calls, yadda yadda.
http://wisdotresearch.wi.gov/wp-content/uploads/tsrelectronicbillboards1.pdf
okay slam away...
:-)
Mike,
ReplyDeleteThe minimum wage laws started to keep women out of the work force, ie sexist reasons, not racist, so it's way better.
Taypayers are paying the salary, benefits, and pension for some clown to stay on the street corner and count sign changes.
ReplyDeleteTom said...
ReplyDeleteTaypayers are paying the salary, benefits, and pension for some clown to stay on the street corner and count sign changes.
What makes you there's just one clown? An 8 hour shift is only part of the day.
The highway safety folks believe these kinds of signs are distracting to which I say No Shit.
ReplyDeletebut the highway guys are insistent that these signs will increase the number of accidents...cause personal and property injury, increase ambulance and tow truck calls, yadda yadda.
Ah ok. I can see that. The argument is, if the sign flips too many times then it is a distraction. Is there a reason why electronic signs are singled out as opposed to those rotating ones one sees on the highway?
But twice per day, Jon? How slow re the cars going that say, every five minutes would be distracting?
ReplyDeleteyeah, I'm not defending it... sounds over the top.
ReplyDeletethe problem is the highway folks have a view and then the planners get to chew on that bone and planners are Nazi's as we all know.
the other thing - these things are going to proliferate like wildfire.
ReplyDeletethe commercial strips are going to look like Las Vegas!
...planners are Nazi's as we all know.
ReplyDeleteNah. They're far to disorganized and slovenly to be Nazis.
I used to live in Virginia. I'm having a hard time seeing Vegas there.
"But twice per day, Jon? How slow re the cars going that say, every five minutes would be distracting"
ReplyDeleteAnd at speeds that slow injuries or fatalities are unlikely.
Of course VDOT traffic information signs aren't a distraction no matter how often they change.
Without any information on why EBBs changing frequently would be a problem, other than the intuitive notion that drivers presented with a new sign might actually read it and be distracted, I would guess that the "fixed billboard lobby" is behind this.
ReplyDelete"They can't compete with the volume....Just a thought"...
ReplyDeleteOh mike the reasons just can't be so mundane, so common as to be about mere money can it?....:-)
I'm sure there's some sort of 'protect the public' strawman argument in there somewhere...
(seriously cool hack!) Man Claims he Can Hack Electronic Billboards with iphone – New York...
(hilarious!) Porn hacker, traffic jam creator nabbed in Novorossiisk