Sunday, June 21, 2009

Capitalism: Still The Most Productive Economic Engine Ever; Our Future Growth Depends On It

A few years from now, strange as it may sound, we might all find that we are hungry for more capitalism, not less. An economic crisis slows growth, and when countries need growth, they turn to markets. After the Mexican and East Asian currency crises—which were far more painful in those countries than the current downturn has been in America—we saw the pace of market-oriented reform speed up.

If, in the years ahead, the American consumer remains reluctant to spend, if federal and state governments groan under their debt loads, if government-owned companies remain expensive burdens, then private-sector activity will become the only path to create jobs. The simple truth is that with all its flaws, capitalism remains the most productive economic engine we have yet invented. Like Churchill's line about democracy, it is the worst of all economic systems, except for the others.

Its chief vindication today has come halfway across the world, in countries like China and India, which have been able to grow and pull hundreds of millions of people out of poverty by supporting markets and free trade. Last month India held elections during the worst of this crisis. Its powerful left-wing parties campaigned against liberalization and got their worst drubbing at the polls in 40 years.

Capitalism means growth, but also instability. The system is dynamic and inherently prone to crashes that cause great damage along the way. For about 90 years, we have been trying to regulate the system to stabilize it while still preserving its energy. We are at the start of another set of these efforts. In undertaking them, it is important to keep in mind what exactly went wrong. What we are experiencing is not a crisis of capitalism. It is a crisis of finance, of democracy, of globalization and ultimately of ethics.

Finance has a history of messing up, from the Dutch tulip bubble in 1637 to now. The proximate causes of these busts have been varied, but follow a strikingly similar path. In calm times, political stability, economic growth and technological innovation all encourage an atmosphere of easy money and new forms of credit. Cheap credit causes greed, miscalculation and eventually ruin.


~From "The Capitalist Manifesto: Greed Is Good (To a point)" in the current issue of Newsweek

9 Comments:

At 6/21/2009 10:50 AM, Blogger saynotomichigan said...

After the Mexican and East Asian currency crises—which were far more painful in those countries than the current downturn has been in America—we saw the pace of market-oriented reform speed up.

This is undoubtedly why there is such a rush to embed more control and more entitlements into the federal government now. As we see the effects of anti-market policy in the failures of blue states, the ability to embed anti-market policy into the federal government will shrink.

 
At 6/21/2009 5:43 PM, Anonymous Dr. T said...

"Like Churchill's line about democracy, it [capitalism] is the worst of all economic systems, except for the others."

Newsweek grudgingly admits that capitalism is better than communism or centrally-controlled economies. But, Newsweek likes capitalism only because it generates jobs and monies for governments to steal. If Newsweek had backed capitalism AND libertarianism, then I would be impressed.

 
At 6/21/2009 10:09 PM, Blogger sethstorm said...


Its chief vindication today has come halfway across the world, in countries like China and India

Nice justification of a slave-labor country and its not-so-nice practices. They're textbook examples on how NOT to do it.

 
At 6/21/2009 10:12 PM, Blogger sethstorm said...


This is undoubtedly why there is such a rush to embed more control and more entitlements into the federal government now. As we see the effects of anti-market policy in the failures of blue states, the ability to embed anti-market policy into the federal government will shrink.

Not in the case of Rust Belt states. They're a case where evasionist policy combined with an envy of their jobs combined to kill a productive region of the nation if not the world.

 
At 6/22/2009 8:51 AM, Blogger juandos said...

"Not in the case of Rust Belt states. They're a case where evasionist policy combined with an envy of their jobs combined to kill a productive region of the nation if not the world"...

Hmmm, is that why sethstorm tens of thousands of companies are stumbling all over themselves to get to that despotic socialist paradise you live in?

Just asking...

Where does your state fall in this line up sethstorm?

From Chief Executive online: CEOs Select Best, Worst States for Job Growth and Business

Texas, North Carolina, Florida Top List as Best States; California, New York, Michigan Are the Worst


Is the city you live in sethstorm on this list?

From Forbes: Best Cities For Jobs

 
At 6/22/2009 10:01 AM, Blogger Jeff Herron said...

Of course, easy credit is primarily a result of central banks interfering with interest rates. To blame such "easy credit" on the free market is incorrect.

If an entity that is not a part of the market interferes in the functioning of the market, the consequences of that interference cannot then be blamed on the functioning of the market itself.

When will such a basic economic principle sink in with the mainstream media?

 
At 6/22/2009 10:07 AM, Blogger sethstorm said...


Is the city you live in on this list?

Yes, and it's a proudly located north of the Mason-Dixon. Forbes hasn't given the city a good shake in years if at all. I don't even think you could pay them to say something substantially good about the area I'm in. It's one of the top declining cities by the way.

They're sneaking out, if I should say anything. The question is why are they sneaking out like NCR has instead of leaving at high speed? The depth of their

 
At 6/22/2009 10:10 AM, Blogger sethstorm said...

Meant:
Businesses are sneaking out where I am. The depth of their strategy is similar to the performance of a bank heist in the middle of a busy day.
The question is why are they sneaking out like NCR has instead of leaving at high speed?

 
At 6/22/2009 1:36 PM, Blogger juandos said...

"Yes, and it's a proudly located north of the Mason-Dixon. Forbes hasn't given the city a good shake in years if at all. I don't even think you could pay them to say something substantially good about the area I'm in"...

How could it be on the list sethstorm if you claim that Forbes, 'hasn't given the city a good shake in years if at all'?

"Businesses are sneaking out where I am. The depth of their strategy is similar to the performance of a bank heist in the middle of a busy day"...

Well the only thing I can get from all that is that YOU have a problem with private ownership...

Those private companies can leave any way they want to leave...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home