Thursday, December 04, 2008

Mobile Phones: Then vs. Now

1987
2008

8 Comments:

At 12/05/2008 12:17 AM, Blogger OBloodyHell said...

You forgot this one:

1967

 
At 12/05/2008 9:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would have appreciated a picture of Zach Morris and his rather large phone more, but I can deal.

 
At 12/05/2008 12:31 PM, Blogger 世上沒有永恆 said...

If you need to pay a certain % of your salary on using mobile phone per month, what percentage are you willing to pay?

 
At 12/05/2008 3:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

To answer your question: as close to zero as possible. I can never spend money on a phone when many providers give them away for free. Of course I am in the minority there. My buddy just bought an iPhone for $300, my phone was $0. He called me yesterday and I heard him perfectly...

 
At 12/05/2008 6:54 PM, Anonymous poor boomer said...

OMG tht fon is so sm I cnt TXT.

p.s. If u cn rd ths msg u cn bcm a sec nd gt gd pa.

 
At 12/05/2008 6:56 PM, Anonymous poor boomer said...

世上沒有永恆 said:

Also, at 10K per year dont you get a decent amount from the EITC, like 200/month? Again, I dont know the specifics.


I'm willing to pay one-half of one percent on using mobile phone per month.

So I have a cheap pre-paid phone that costs $5 per month.

 
At 12/05/2008 10:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only drawbacks...how does one see the #'s (the joys of middle aged sight!) or press the buttons let alone find such an itty bitty phone in your purse. Chances are the vibrate feature ain't much fun either.

 
At 12/06/2008 3:03 AM, Blogger OBloodyHell said...

> Chances are the vibrate feature ain't much fun either.

Depends on where the holster is located....

8oP

 

Post a Comment

<< Home