Wednesday, November 25, 2009


Recently leaked emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom expose deceit, duplicity and collusion between climate researchers to maintain the fraud of the manmade global warming theory. These emails reveal stunning behind-the-scenes details about how this fraud has been developed and perpetuated. In this video historical climatologist and retired university professor Dr. Timothy F. Ball shares his insights on what they show.

Here are several more links on Climategate:

CLIMATE BOMBSHELL: Hacker leaks thousands of emails showing conspiracy to "hide" the real data on manmade climate change

The Death Blow to Climate Science

And of course, Wikipedia already has a webpage: Climatic Research Unit e-mail Hacking Incident


At 11/25/2009 9:30 AM, Blogger dw said...

To my thinking, that hand picked small group of elite influential scientist so committed to result oriented research, and their in turn handpicked young up and coming clueless sycophant underlings are apart of the much larger agenda/conspiracy of an emerging global authority.

Controlling economies is prerequisite must for a global authority and currency. This climate agenda, in concert with legislated failure of private financial institutiions is a perfect legitimate front for a good start.

Now if someone could hack the books of the IRS and the Federal reserve, or the UN's humanitarian body members correspondence emails, or some high level whistle blowers from some off shore financial institutions came forward?

I suspect everyone that knows some history would shit their pants.

At 11/25/2009 9:56 AM, Blogger Jack Croww said...

Note that some "greenwashing" of the Wikipedia article may be occurring:

At 11/25/2009 10:16 AM, Blogger W.E. Heasley said...

Does this mean the documentary title “An Inconvenient Truth” was Orwellian?

At 11/25/2009 10:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If these were internal Exxon-Mobil e-mails, the trial lawyers would be racing out the door with only one pants-leg filled and every Green press flack would be demanding this lead the evening news and front every newspaper above the fold. If similar e-mails came from the RNC showing racism or homophobia, the New York Times would not demur in the name of privacy, it would call for the GOP to go into federal receivership.

- Jonah Goldberg, writing about the CRU's climate change memos and documents

National Review

At 11/25/2009 11:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

During the Bush administration the Democrats pretentiously whined about "politicizing the science", and how all that would change once they were in charge. These memos reveal who was actually politicizing the science all along. But don't look for any acts of contrition, the left has and endless capacity for self-delusion.

At 11/25/2009 11:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Humans have endless capacity for self delusion, whether left, right or center. I hardly think anyone has cornered the market on self delusion.

At 11/25/2009 11:53 AM, Anonymous Steve said...

The fraud is slowly being revealed. Thank goodness there were no mass laws created in the US like Cap and Trade to try to combat this non-existent condition.

At 11/25/2009 12:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Humans have endless capacity for self delusion, whether left, right or center. I hardly think anyone has cornered the market on self delusion.

I rest my case.

At 11/25/2009 1:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The CRU has a history of putting its internal data on the public side of its servers. In the July 2009 "leak", it turn out that the director of the CRU put that data for a FOI on the public side of their server.

The data that has just come out matches a second FOI request. After the police investigation, we will find that the CRU is being the CRU and manage's their data files in the same manner they conduct their science.

At 11/25/2009 4:35 PM, Blogger juandos said...

Is it just me but when someone releases information that liberals love to bash conservatives with that person is a whistle blower but if the tables are turned then that person is a hacker and or a thief?

From American Thinker dated December 23, 2006: New York Times Passes Sensitive Information to Terrorists - Again

From Ed Driscoll dated November 22nd, 2009: All The News That’s Fit To Bury

At 11/26/2009 8:10 AM, Blogger juandos said...

Well it seems that 'true believers' even had computer code manipulated to foist their global warming nonsense off onto the public...

Congress May Probe Leaked Global Warming E-Mails

At 11/30/2009 8:43 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of Climategate is the source code of the programs used as part of the climate modeling.

Casually scanning through the code it is possible to see a section that removes data outliers - standard stuff for data cleansing, but the big surprise is that only outliers on the 'cooling' side are removed.

Outliers that support Hadley's contention of GW are not filtered!

I suspect close scrutiny of the code would show further dishonest data manipulation.

The emails are interesting and show collusion, but the code is the real smoking gun.

At 12/04/2009 11:12 AM, Blogger The Filthy Engineer said...

The smoking Gun?

This could be it.


Post a Comment

<< Home