MP: Actually, the seasonally-adjusted decline in retail sales was only -.055% (from $342.497 billion in June to $342.309 billion in July), so by rounding to only one decimal place the reported percentage decline (-0.10%) was almost twice the actual percentage decline (-0.055%).
Additionally, the Census Bureau reports shows a +1.11% increase in July retail sales without seasonal adjustment ($355.243 billion in July from $351.360 billion in June). And the BLS reported today that the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) decreased 0.2% in July before seasonal adjustment. Therefore, real retail sales in July, adjusted for the 0.2% deflation in July, actually increased by 1.16% before seasonal adjustment.
Can you choose to ignore seasonal adjustments whenever they don't fit your ideology?
ReplyDeleteI noticed you didn't show the valid comparison of this July to previous July. This would remove the problem of season adjustments.
Why is it that you never respond to comments?
Bill: Thanks for your comments, you make a valid point.
ReplyDeleteMark
The issue in the WSJ seemed to highlight the .1% drop vs the .07% increase expected by economists, so -.1 or -.05 is not really significant and issue...
ReplyDeleteLet us agree that the results are flat. Every retailer wants an increase from the previous year but I think consumers want to pay cash (or debit) and that is in short supply.
ReplyDelete@gettingrational
ReplyDeleteThe problem with that is, that the results weren't flat. YoY sales are down 8.3%.
That fact wasn't mentioned.
http://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.html